A State-by-State Guide to Teacher Evaluation Systems in the US

This list and accompanying resources provide an in-depth look at the various teacher evaluation systems used throughout the United States. It offers a clear and concise overview of each state’s evaluation process, providing information on the specific criteria and methods used to evaluate teachers’ performance. Additionally, many of these systems also include requirements for informal observations or classroom walkthroughs as a part of the evaluation process. For systems that include these requirements, Education Walkthrough‘s app can help instructional leaders streamline the observation, documentation, and analysis process, making the process more efficient and effective. This guide is an essential resource for educators, instructional leaders, and administrators looking to understand and navigate the complex landscape of teacher evaluation systems in the US. With this guide, you will be able to unlock the secrets of success and make the most of the resources available to you and your school.

Alabama – The Alabama State Department of Education uses the Alabama Educator Evaluation SystemThe website is https://www.alsde.edu/sec/sct/Pages/default.aspx(AEE) to evaluate the performance of educators in the state. The AEE is a comprehensive system that includes multiple measures of educator performance, including student achievement, classroom observations, and surveys of students, parents, and peers. The AEE also includes a professional development component that allows educators to improve their practice. The AEE is designed to provide feedback to educators on their performance and to help them identify areas for improvement. The AEE is used to inform educator effectiveness, professional development, and personnel decisions.
Alaska – The Alaska Department of Education uses the Alaska Teacher and Principal Evaluation SystemThe website for the Alaska Department of Education is https://education.alaska.gov/(TPES) to evaluate teachers and principals. The TPES is a comprehensive system that includes multiple teacher and principal performance measures. The system includes various components, such as classroom observations, student surveys, and student achievement data. The system also includes a professional development component that allows teachers and principals to improve their practice. The TPES is designed to provide feedback to teachers and principals on their performance and to help them identify areas for improvement. The system is also used to inform teacher and principal effectiveness decisions and to support professional growth.
Arizona – The Arizona Department of Education uses the Arizona Teacher and Principal Evaluation SystemThe website is https://www.azed.gov/tpes/(TPES) to evaluate teachers and principals. The system is based on the Arizona Educator Evaluation System (AEES), which is a comprehensive evaluation system that includes multiple measures of educator performance. The TPES includes a variety of components, including classroom observations, student surveys, and student achievement data. The system also includes a professional development component, which provides teachers and principals with the opportunity to receive feedback and support from their peers and administrators. The TPES is designed to provide educators with meaningful feedback and support to help them improve their practice and increase student achievement.
Arkansas – The Arkansas Department of Education uses the Arkansas Teacher Excellence and Support SystemThe website is https://adess.arkansas.gov/(TESS) to evaluate teachers and provide support for their professional growth. The program is based on the Danielson Framework for Teaching, which is a research-based model for evaluating teacher performance. The program includes four components: planning and preparation, classroom environment, instruction, and professional responsibilities. Each component is evaluated using a rubric that includes criteria such as student engagement, classroom management, and use of instructional strategies. The program also includes a professional development component that provides teachers with resources and support to help them improve their practice. The program is designed to help teachers become more effective and to ensure that all students receive a quality education.
California – The California Department of Education uses the Evaluation Support Systemhttps://www.cde.ca.gov/pd/ps/evaluationsystems.asp(ESS) to evaluate the performance of schools and districts. The ESS is a comprehensive system that includes data from multiple sources, including student achievement, school climate, and financial data. The system is designed to provide an accurate and comprehensive picture of school performance. The ESS is used to identify improvement areas and develop strategies to improve student achievement. The system also provides information to help schools and districts make informed decisions about resources and programs. The ESS is used to evaluate the effectiveness of school and district programs, and to identify areas of improvement. The system also provides data to help schools and districts make informed decisions about resources and programs. The ESS is used to evaluate the performance of schools and districts, and to identify areas of improvement. The system also provides data to help schools and districts make informed decisions about resources and programs.
Colorado – The Colorado Department of Education uses the Colorado Teacher and Principal Evaluation SystemThe website for the Colorado Department of Education is https://www.cde.state.co.us/(TPES) to evaluate teachers and principals. The system is based on the Colorado Academic Standards and the Colorado Professional Standards for Educators. The evaluation process includes a review of the educator’s performance in the classroom, as well as a review of the educator’s professional practice. The evaluation is based on multiple measures, including student achievement, classroom observations, and feedback from students, parents, and colleagues. The evaluation is used to inform professional development and support for educators and to inform decisions about educator effectiveness.
Connecticut – The Connecticut State Department of Education uses the Connecticut Teacher Evaluation and Support SystemThe website is https://cttess.ct.gov/(CTESS) to evaluate and support teachers. The system is designed to provide teachers with feedback and support to help them improve their practice. The system includes a comprehensive evaluation process that includes multiple measures of teacher performance, including student achievement, classroom observations, and teacher self-assessments. The evaluation process also includes professional development activities and support for teachers to help them improve their practice. The system also provides resources and support for school administrators to help them effectively evaluate and support teachers.
Delaware – The Delaware Department of Education uses the Delaware Performance Appraisal System for EducatorsThe website for the Delaware Department of Education is https://www.doe.k12.de.us/(DPAS-II) to evaluate the performance of educators in the state. The system is based on the Delaware Professional Standards for Educators and is designed to comprehensively evaluate an educator’s performance. The system includes a variety of components, including a self-assessment, peer review, and administrator review. The system also includes a variety of measures, such as student achievement, professional growth, and classroom management. The system is designed to provide feedback to educators on their performance and to help them improve their practice. The system also informs decisions about educator compensation and professional development.
Florida – The Florida Department of Education uses the Florida Teacher and Principal Evaluation SystemThe website is https://www.fldoe.org/teaching/evaluation-system/(FTPES) to evaluate teachers and principals in the state. The FTPES is a comprehensive system that includes multiple teacher and principal performance measures, including student achievement, classroom observations, and surveys. The system is designed to provide feedback to teachers and principals on their performance and to help them improve their practice. The FTPES is used to inform teacher and principal effectiveness, professional development, and personnel decisions. The system also provides data to inform district and state-level decisions about educator effectiveness.
Georgia – The Georgia Department of Education uses the Georgia Teacher Keys Effectiveness SystemThe website is https://www.gadoe.org/Teacher-Leader-Effectiveness/Pages/Georgia-Teacher-Keys-Effectiveness-System.aspx(GATKES) to evaluate the performance of teachers in the state. The system is based on a combination of student achievement data, classroom observations, and other measures of teacher effectiveness. The system is designed to provide an objective and comprehensive evaluation of teacher performance. The evaluation is based on a variety of factors, including student achievement, classroom observations, and other measures of teacher effectiveness. The system is designed to provide an objective and comprehensive evaluation of teacher performance. The evaluation is based on a variety of factors, including student achievement, classroom observations, and other measures of teacher effectiveness. The evaluation is used to inform decisions about teacher compensation, professional development, and other personnel decisions. The system also provides feedback to teachers on their performance and provides guidance on how to improve their teaching practices.
Hawaii – The Hawaii Department of Education uses the Hawaii Teacher Standards-Based Evaluation SystemThe website for the Hawaii Department of Education is https://www.hawaiipublicschools.org/The Hawaii Teacher Standards-Based Evaluation System is a comprehensive system for evaluating teachers in the state of Hawaii. The system is based on the Hawaii Teacher Standards, which are a set of standards that define the knowledge, skills, and dispositions that teachers need to be successful in the classroom. The system includes a variety of components, including a teacher self-assessment, classroom observations, student surveys, and other measures of teacher performance. The system is designed to provide teachers with feedback on their performance and to help them improve their practice. The system also provides school administrators with data to inform teacher development and professional growth decisions.
Idaho – The Idaho State Department of Education uses the Idaho Educator Evaluation Systemhttps://sde.idaho.gov/educator-effectiveness/to evaluate educators in the state. The system is based on the Danielson Framework for Teaching, which is a research-based model for evaluating teaching practice. The system includes four components: observation, student feedback, professional practice, and student growth. Educators are evaluated on each of these components, and the results are used to inform professional development and support. The system also includes a system of support for educators, including mentoring, coaching, and professional learning communities.
Illinois – The Illinois State Board of Education uses the Illinois Teacher Evaluation FrameworkThe website is https://www.isbe.net/Pages/Illinois-Teacher-Evaluation-Framework.aspxto evaluate teachers. The framework is based on the Danielson Framework for Teaching, which is a research-based model for evaluating teacher performance. The framework includes four domains: planning and preparation, classroom environment, instruction, and professional responsibilities. Each domain is further broken down into components and indicators. The evaluation process includes observations, student surveys, and other evidence of teacher performance. The evaluation results are used to inform professional development and support for teachers.
Indiana – The Indiana Department of Education uses the Indiana Educator Evaluation Systemwebsite: https://www.doe.in.gov/indiana-educator-evaluation-systemto evaluate teachers and administrators. The system is based on the Indiana Professional Standards Board’s standards for educators. The evaluation system includes four components: Professional Growth and Development, Student Growth and Achievement, Professional Practice, and Leadership. Each component is evaluated using a rubric that includes criteria such as classroom management, instructional strategies, and communication. The evaluation is conducted by a trained evaluator based on evidence collected from multiple sources, including classroom observations, student work, and colleague feedback. The evaluation results are used to inform professional development plans and to provide feedback to educators.
Iowa – The Iowa Department of Education uses the Iowa Teacher Evaluation SystemThe website is https://educateiowa.gov/teacher-evaluation-system(ITES) to evaluate teachers. The system is based on the Iowa Professional Development Model (IPDM) and is designed to provide teachers with feedback on their performance. The evaluation process includes a pre-observation conference, classroom observation, post-observation conference, and a summative evaluation. The evaluation is based on the Iowa Core Teaching Standards and the Iowa Professional Development Model. The evaluation is conducted by a trained evaluator and includes a review of the teacher’s lesson plans, classroom management, instructional strategies, and student engagement. The evaluation also includes a review of the teacher’s professional development activities. The evaluation results are used to inform the teacher’s professional development plan and to provide feedback to the teacher on their performance.
Kansas – The Kansas State Department of Education uses the Kansas Teacher Evaluation SystemThe website is https://www.ksde.org/Agency/Division-of-Learning-Services/Educator-Licensure-and-Accreditation/Kansas-Teacher-Evaluation-System(K-TES) to evaluate teachers. The system is based on the Danielson Framework for Teaching, which is a research-based model for evaluating teacher performance. The evaluation process includes four components: planning and preparation, classroom environment, instruction, and professional responsibilities. Each component is evaluated using a rubric that includes student engagement, lesson objectives, and classroom management criteria. The evaluation is conducted by a trained evaluator who observes the teacher in the classroom and provides feedback. The teacher then has the opportunity to reflect on the feedback and make changes to their teaching practice. The evaluation is used to inform professional development and support for teachers.
Kentucky – The Kentucky Department of Education uses the Kentucky Teacher Evaluation SystemThe website for the Kentucky Department of Education is education.ky.gov(KTES) to evaluate teachers. The system is based on the Kentucky Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (KPGES) and is designed to provide teachers with feedback on their performance. The evaluation process includes a review of the teacher’s performance in the classroom, as well as a review of the teacher’s professional development activities. The evaluation is based on a variety of criteria, including student achievement, classroom management, instructional strategies, and professional development. The evaluation is conducted by a team of administrators, teachers, and other stakeholders. The results of the evaluation are used to inform decisions about teacher development, professional growth, and performance.
Louisiana – The Louisiana Department of Education uses the Louisiana Educator Evaluation SystemThe website is https://www.louisianabelieves.com/ee/(LEES) to evaluate the performance of educators in the state. The system is based on the Louisiana Professional Standards for Educators and is designed to provide feedback to educators on their performance. The evaluation process includes a review of the educator’s performance in the classroom, as well as a review of the educator’s professional development activities. The evaluation is conducted by a team of evaluators, which includes administrators, teachers, and other stakeholders. The evaluation results inform decisions about educator effectiveness and provide feedback to educators on their performan